Webb v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) et al, No. 3:2017cv00878 - Document 48 (N.D. Tex. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: re: 46 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 42 Motion to Reopen Case filed by Deninah K Goodwin Webb IS DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 2/23/2018) (svc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Webb v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) et al Doc. 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DENINAH GOODWIN WEBB, Plaintiff, V. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT (DART), ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § No. 3:17-CV-878-M ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. Court An objection was filed by Plaintiff. The District reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed Findings, Cnclusions, and Recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Deninah Goodwin Webb’s Motion to Reopen Case [Dkt. No. 42], construed as a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), is therefore DENIED. SO ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2018. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
