Pickett v. Williams etal, No. 3:2017cv00557 - Document 13 (N.D. Tex. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER re: 11 Findings and Recommendations on Case. On 4/4/2017, it was recommended that this action be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow court orders because the plaintiff had failed to respond to a Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire as ordered. Because the plaintiff has now responded, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation are hereby VACATED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 5/3/2017) (axm)

Download PDF
Pickett v. Williams etal Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JODY WAYNE PICKETT, Plaintiff, vs. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et. al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:17-CV-557-C-BH Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge ORDER Pursuant to Special Order No. 3-251, this pro se case has been automatically referred for pretrial management. On April 7, 2017, it was recommended that this action be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow court orders because the plaintiff had failed to respond to a Magistrate Judge’s Questionnaire as ordered. (See doc. 11.) On May 2, 2017, he filed his answers to the questionnaire. (See doc. 12.) Because the plaintiff has now responded, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation are hereby VACATED. SO ORDERED on May 3, 2017. ___________________________________ IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.