Finch v. Dallas County Sheriff Department et al, No. 3:2016cv03543 - Document 17 (N.D. Tex. 2018)

Court Description: Order Accepting 16 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 8/29/2018) (epm)

Download PDF
Finch v. Dallas County Sheriff Department et al Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION NATHAN DONTRION FINCH, ID # 16055223, Petitioner, vs. DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:16-CV-3543-B ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED as moot. A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required to appeal in a case under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Montano v. Texas, 867 F.3d 540, 547 n.8 (5th Cir. 2017). If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. SO ORDERED. Dockets.Justia.com _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.