Jordan v. Social Security Administration et al, No. 3:2016cv03270 - Document 9 (N.D. Tex. 2016)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 7 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 2 Complaint, filed by Stevie C Jordan; granting 8 Motion (construed as a motion to amend complaint). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 12/29/2016) (mem)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jordan v. Social Security Administration et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION STEVIE C. JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SSI, HHSC, DHA, and HUD, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-3270-L ORDER This pro se action was referred to Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver, who entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on December 6, 2016, recommending that the court dismiss the action. The Report determined that Plaintiff’s complaint alleged substantially the same facts, events, and defendants as Plaintiff’s previous lawsuits in Case No. 3:15-CV-1086-B-BH. Accordingly, the Report concluded that this action is duplicative and should be dismissed as malicious and frivolous. No objections have been filed to the report; however, on December 8, 2016, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff, “Qui Tam” Original Complaint’s for Monetary Relief Request for Disclosure Only, Affidavit, Exhibits, Certificate of Service, Amendment List (Doc. 8) . The court construes this motion as a motion to amend Plaintiff’s complaint and grants the motion to amend. Although the amended complaint, is much longer than the one-line original complaint, the amended complaint continues to allege claims that are duplicative of those asserted by Plaintiff in his prior lawsuit. Order – Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com Having reviewed the amended complaint, file, Report, and record in this case, the court determines that even with the amended complaint the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. The court dismisses this action with prejudice. It is so ordered this 29th day of December, 2016. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
