Tyler v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, et al, No. 3:2016cv01698 - Document 9 (N.D. Tex. 2016)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 8 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Complaint, filed by Lou Tyler. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/16/2016) (mem)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Tyler v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LOU TYLER, Plaintiff, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and DEUTSCHE BANK, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-1698-L ORDER On June 22, 2016, pro se Plaintiff Lou Tyler (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Deutsche Bank (collectively, “Defendants”) requesting that the court reconsider and reverse a previous decision entered in favor of Defendants. * The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney for initial screening who entered the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on July 19, 2016, recommending that the court dismiss Plaintiff’s this action with prejudice as barred by res judicata because Plaintiff asserts the same claims that were or could have been adjudicated in a previous suit, Tyler v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 3:15-CV-1117N-BK (N.D. Tex. 2015). No objections to the Report were filed. After reviewing the pleadings, file, record, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses with prejudice this action as barred by res judicata. * The Report states that Plaintiff filed a petition in state court in June 2016; however, this action commenced in federal court. Order – Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com It is so ordered this 16th day of August, 2016. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
