Bagley v. PennyMac Corp., No. 3:2016cv00420 - Document 29 (N.D. Tex. 2017)
Court Description: Order Accepting 28 Findings and Recommendations re: 24 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by PennyMac Corp. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's 24 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims shall be dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 6/9/2017) (epm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bagley v. PennyMac Corp. Doc. 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CLARESA BAGLEY, Plaintiff, v. PENNYMAC CORP., Defendant. § § § § § No. 3:16-CV-00420-N (BF) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney dated May 1, 2017. The Court reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 24] is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims shall be dismissed with prejudice. SO ORDERED, this 9th day of June, 2017. DAVID C. GODBEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
