Rambo v. Valdez et al, No. 3:2016cv00002 - Document 18 (N.D. Tex. 2016)

Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 15 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Complaint. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 8/17/2016) (epm)

Download PDF
Rambo v. Valdez et al Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS WORTH DIVISION OZI RAMBO, Petitioner, v. LUPE VALDEZ et al., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-002-O ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation (“FCR”) (ECF No. 15) in this case and recommended that this Court dismiss this case as frivolous. Petitioner, pro se prisoner, filed a Notice of Interlocutory Appeal (ECF No. 17) stating that he “lacks the ability to represent himself properly and efficiently and effectively—with due diligence—and therefore requires legal counsel of a professional nature.” Notice Appeal 1, ECF No. 17. T h e Court construes Petitioner’s filing as an objection. The Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objections were made and it ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Taking Petitioner’s claims as true, the Petitioner failed to specifically object to the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings and legal conclusions on the medical care rendered, the failure to protect claim, and the non-jural entities in compliance with 28 U.S.C. §636(B)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). FCR 1–4, ECF No. 15. Dockets.Justia.com Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ACCEPTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED on this 17th day of August, 2016. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.