Bradford et al v. US Bank National Association et al, No. 3:2015cv01450 - Document 36 (N.D. Tex. 2016)
Court Description: Order Accepting 35 Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court grants the 23 Motion to Dismiss, denies as moot the 22 Motion for Judgment, and dismisses with prejudice this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/14/2016) (rekc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bradford et al v. US Bank National Association et al Doc. 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ANTHONY BRADFORD AND IBRAHIM REGINALD MUHAMMAD, Plaintiffs, v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOICATION c/o Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. AND HUGHES WATTERS & ASKANASE, LLP, as Substitute Trustee, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-1450-L ORDER Before the court is the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 22), filed March 25, 2016; and the Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution (Doc. 23), filed March 25, 2016. Plaintiff did not respond to either of the motions. On June 20, 2016, Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) recommending that the court grant the Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution (Doc. 23), deny as moot the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 22), and dismiss with prejudice this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. No objections were filed to the Report. Having reviewed the motions, pleadings, file, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants the Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution Order – Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com (Doc. 23), denies as moot the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 22), and dismisses with prejudice this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. It is so ordered this 14th day of July, 2016. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
