Jones v. UPS et al, No. 3:2015cv01315 - Document 41 (N.D. Tex. 2016)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 40 Findings and Recommendations on Motion. Defendant United Parcel Service Inc, (Ohio)'s ("UPS") Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(5), filed on December 11, 2015, is GRANTED, and Defendant Roy Matthew's Re-Urged 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, filed on January 29, 2016, is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/22/2016) (ndt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jones v. UPS et al Doc. 41 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION VALENCIA F. JONES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., (OHIO), and ROY MATTHEWS, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-1315-K ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc., (Ohio)’s (“UPS”) Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(5), filed on December 11, 2015, is GRANTED, and Defendant Roy Matthew’s Re-Urged 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, filed on January 29, 2016, is GRANTED. SO ORDERED Signed August 20th, 2016. ____________________________________ ED KINKEADE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
