Peterson et al v. City of Duncanville et al, No. 3:2015cv00247 - Document 102 (N.D. Tex. 2017)
Court Description: Order Accepting 101 Findings and Recommendations re: 70 Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by Andy Armstrong, Eddie Edwards. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' (Armstrong & Edwards) 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/26/2017) (ndt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Peterson et al v. City of Duncanville et al Doc. 102 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KRISTINE PETERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANDY ARMSTRONG, et al., Defendants. § § § § § No. 3:15-CV-247-M (BF) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The Court reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ (Armstrong & Edwards) 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 70] is GRANTED. SO ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2017. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN CHIEF JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
