Duru v. Berger Psychological Services PC et al, No. 3:2015cv00120 - Document 26 (N.D. Tex. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER Accepting Findings and Recommendation of the United States District Judge, re 25 Findings and Recommendations on Case. Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED sua sponte for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 12/22/2015) (mem)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Duru v. Berger Psychological Services PC et al Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ROSE ADANMA DURU, Plaintiff, vs. BERGER PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES PC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:15-CV-120-B ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED sua sponte for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and Defendants Berger Psychological Services, P.C.’s & Steven Gary Berger Ph.D.’s Motion to Dismiss, filed April 13, 2015 (doc. 12) is DEEMED MOOT. By separate judgment, the claims against defendants Berger Psychological Services, P.C., Steven Gary Berger Ph.D., Unidentified Female Assistant of Steven Gary Berger PC will be DISMISSED sua sponte for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Dockets.Justia.com SIGNED this 22nd day of December, 2015. _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
