Wynn v. USA, No. 3:2014cv02142 - Document 9 (N.D. Tex. 2015)
Court Description: Order Accepting 8 Findings and Recommendations on Case. The court dismisses with prejudice Movant's action as barred by the statute of limitation. Pursuant to Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court will enter judgment by separate document. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 11/25/2015) (sss)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wynn v. USA Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ERIC TIMOTHY WYNN, #33655-077, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-2142-L ORDER Before the court is Movant Eric Timothy Wynn’s (“Movant”) pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 2), filed June 11, 2014. The action was referred to Magistrate Judge David L. Horan for pretrial management, who entered the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on November 5, 2015, recommending that the court dismiss the action as barred by the statute of limitations. No objections to the Report were filed. Having reviewed the file, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses with prejudice Movant’s action as barred by the statute of limitation. Pursuant to Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court will enter judgment by separate document. It is so ordered this 25th day of November, 2015. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Solo Page Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
