Russell v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID, No. 3:2014cv00646 - Document 40 (N.D. Tex. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER Accepting 37 Findings and Recommendations on case. The 32 Motion to Set Aside Judgment and 33 Motion Relief from Judgment are DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Jorge A Solis on 12/9/2015) (mem)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Russell v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TORA LAKEITH RUSSELL, ID # 1632168, Petitioner, ) ) ) vs. ) WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:14-CV-0646-P-BH ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. 37) and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions ofthe Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Motion to Move for Ruling and to Set Aside Final Judgment (doc.32), and Motion FRCP 60(b) Relieffrom Judgment (doc. 33), both filed September 24, are DENIED. SO ORDERED. Signed this 91h day of December, 2015. CHIEF JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
