Edwards v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, No. 3:2014cv00417 - Document 20 (N.D. Tex. 2014)
Court Description: Order Accepting 13 Findings and Recommendations re: 2 Complaint, filed by Keith Edwards. Plaintiffs Section 1983 claims are summarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his claims under the Texas constitution. (Ordered by Judge Jorge A Solis on 11/10/2014) (aaa)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
--- -- Edwards v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KEITH EDWARDS, § § § Plaintiff, § § § § § § v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Defendant. No. 3:14-cv-417-P ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. Plaintifffiled no objections, however, he filed motions for voluntary dismissal on October 6, 2014 and October 20, 2014. The motions for voluntary dismissal are denied. However, the Court notes that Plaintiffs claims based on the Texas Constitution are dismissed without prejudice. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Section 1983 claims are summarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his claims under the Texas constitution. SO ORDERED this day of , 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
