Copeland v. D&J Construction LLC et al, No. 3:2013cv04432 - Document 67 (N.D. Tex. 2015)
Court Description: Order Accepting 62 Findings and Recommendations on Motion. Defendant's [sic] Motion to Exclude/Dismiss Individual Natural Persons of L.L.C. from Litigation, filed 4/1/2014 (doc. 32) is granted in part, and the plaintiff's usury, breach of implied contract, sworn account, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment claims against Darrell Gray and Ethel Yolanda Gray are dismissed. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/6/2015) (jrr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Copeland v. D&J Construction LLC et al Doc. 67 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION § § § § § § § BRUCE COPELAND, Plaintiff, vs. D & J CONSTRUCTION LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 3:13-CV-4432-N-BH Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, Defendant’s [sic] Motion to Exclude/Dismiss Individual Natural Persons of L.L.C. from Litigation, filed April 1, 2014 (doc. 32) is GRANTED in part, and the plaintiff’s usury, breach of implied contract, sworn account, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment claims against Darrell Gray and Ethel Yolanda Gray are DISMISSED. SIGNED this 6th day of February, 2015. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
