Wilkerson v. Thaler, No. 3:2013cv01694 - Document 59 (N.D. Tex. 2013)
Court Description: Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge re: For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, petitioner's Motion for Relief From Judgment, received on 7/5/2013 51 , and F acts, Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of Senrick Wilkerson, received on 7/9/2013 52 are construed as Rule 60(b) motions and are both DENIED. Because the Court denies petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, his Demand for Release from custody 56 is also denied. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/22/2013) (ndt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wilkerson v. Thaler Doc. 59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON, ID # 10093432, Petitioner, vs. RICK THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:13-CV-1694-M-BH ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, petitioner’s Motion for Relief From Judgment, received on July 5, 2013 (doc. 51), and Facts, Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of Senrick Wilkerson, received on July 9, 2013 (doc. 52) are construed as Rule 60(b) motions and are both DENIED. Because the Court denies petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment, his Demand for Release from custody (doc. 56) is also denied. SO ORDERED this 22nd day of August, 2013. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
