Bank of America N.A. v. Grant Scott, et al, No. 3:2008cv01935 - Document 8 (N.D. Tex. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations granting 4 Motion to Compel, denies 6 Motion to Stay and dismisses Plaintiff's action with prejudice. (See Order) (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/16/2009) (skt)

Download PDF
Bank of America N.A. v. Grant Scott, et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. GRANT J. SCOTT, Trustee of THE GET GOOD TRUST; and JAMES DONDERO, individually and as Trustee of CANIS MAJOR TRUST, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-1935-L ORDER Before the court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed February 25, 2009. Plaintiff did not file objections. Defendants moved to compel arbitration of this action pursuant to a loan agreement and guaranty, dated December 21, 2007, entered into by Plaintiff and Defendants. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion, but states that the court should stay, rather than dismiss, the action pending arbitration. The magistrate judge held that although the court has discretion to dismiss the action, Defendants did not oppose Plaintiff’s request to stay the action, and therefore recommended compelling arbitration but staying and administratively closing the action. Having reviewed the pleadings, file and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct. The court determines that there is no reason to stay this action, as all of the claims are subject to arbitration, and therefore the court has discretion to dismiss with prejudice notwithstanding the language of 9 U.S.C. § 3. Alford v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 975 F.2d 1161, 1164 (5th Cir. 1992); see also Order – Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com Fedmet Corp. v. M/V BUYALYK, 194 F.3d 674, 676 (5th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions are therefore accepted by the court. The court, however, disagrees that the action should be stayed, as all matters are arbitrable. Accordingly, the court grants Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration, denies Plaintiff’s request to stay the action, and dismisses Plaintiff’s action with prejudice. It is so ordered this 16th day of March, 2009. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.