Jones v. Padilla et al, No. 2:2021cv00212 - Document 27 (N.D. Tex. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM re: 25 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Complaint, filed by David Paiz Jones. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 9/11/2023) (daa)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jones v. Padilla et al Doc. 27 Case 2:21-cv-00212-Z-BR Document 27 Filed 09/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 111 IN THE I--JNITED STATES DISTRICT COTJRT FOR TFItl NORTHERN DIS'|RICT OF T'EXAS AMARI[,LO DIVISION DAVID PAIZ JONES. I) lainti l'l . \ 2:21 -C'Y-212-Z-BR C'ASIIY' PAI)lLLA. et ul.. I)c t'endants OITDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLTISIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION ANI) DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM Befbre the Court are the findings, conclusions, and recommendation (''FCR") of the United States Magistrate Judge to dismiss the civil rights claim filed by Plaintifl. ECF No. 19. Objections to the findings, conclusions. and recommendation have been tiled. ECF No.26.r Afier making an independent review of the pleadings, flles, records, and objections in this case, the Court concludes that the tindings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct. It is therefbre ORDERED that the findings. conclusions. and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED and the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PRE.IUDICE. I-I IS SO ORDERED September I 202 3 W J. KACSMARYK tJNI-flrD S-lATf S DIST'RICT .lLI DGtr I Plaintitf tiled a response to De't'endant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26), which the Court will consider as objections to the FCR. abundance ofcaution - - out of an Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
