Lara-Haynes v. Garcia et al, No. 2:2019cv00056 - Document 30 (N.D. Tex. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER re: 29 Findings and Recommendations on Case; 20 Motion; 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED. Defendants' Joint Motion is GRANTED and, consequently, Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED. Defendants' Motion to Seal (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk on 1/28/2021) (nhp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lara-Haynes v. Garcia et al Doc. 30 Case 2:19-cv-00056-Z-BR Document 30 Filed 01/28/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 267 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION LORENZO LARA-HAYNES, Plaintiff, v. CIPRIANO GARCIA and AARON HERRERA, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § 2:19-CV-056-Z ORDER On January 6, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge entered findings and conclusions (ECF No. 29) on Defendant Garcia and Herrera’s Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21). No objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation have been filed. After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED. Defendants’ Joint Motion is GRANTED and, consequently, Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED. Defendants’ Motion to Seal (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. January 28, 2021. ________________________________ MATTHEW J. KACSMARYK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
