Whiting v. Lambert et al, No. 2:2016cv00261 - Document 46 (N.D. Tex. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER denying 28 Motion for TRO; denying 28 Motion for Injunction; denying 28 Motion for Hearing; denying as moot 30 MOTION for a Ruling on Motion T.R.O. and Motion for Show Cause Hearing and Preliminary Injunction on Defendants filed by Michael C Whiting; adopting Report and Recommendations re 40 Findings and Recommendations on Case. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/8/2018) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Whiting v. Lambert et al Doc. 46 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION MICHAEL C. WHITING, Plaintiff, v. ADRIAN LAMBERT, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:16-CV-261-D ORDER After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, the July 11, 2018 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, and plaintiff’s August 7, 2018 objections, the court concludes the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that plaintiff’s January 29, 2018 motion for a temporary restraining order, motion for preliminary injunction, and motion for an (emergency) show cause hearing are denied, and his February 21, 2018 motion for a ruling on motion T.R.O. and motion for show cause hearing and preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice as moot. SO ORDERED. August 8, 2018. _________________________________ SIDNEY A. FITZWATER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
