Cobble v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, No. 1:2020cv00113 - Document 23 (N.D. Tex. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, re: 22 Findings and Recommendations. United States Magistrate Judge John R. Parker made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) in thi s case 22 . Judge Parker recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. No objections to the FCR were filed. The District Court has therefore reviewed the proposed FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed. Accordingly, the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/10/2021) (jak)

Download PDF
Cobble v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration Doc. 23 Case 1:20-cv-00113-H-BU Document 23 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 682 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION MILTON L. C.. Plaintiff, No. 1:20-CV-113-H-BU ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Securiry Adminisrration. Defendant ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF TIIE UNITED STATE S MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge John R. Parker made Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation (FCR) in this case on July 23, 2021. See a Dkt. No. 22. Judge Parker recommended that the Court affrm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Securiry. Id. at22. No objections to the FCR were fi.led. The District Court has therefore reviewed the proposed FCR for plarn error. Finding none, the Court accepts the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is afflrmed. Accordingly, the plaintiffs complaint is dismissed with prejudice. So ordered on x,tgtst /O ,2021. /" JAM WESLEY HENDRIX D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.