Flores v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, No. 6:2014cv00775 - Document 12 (E.D. Tex. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceedings. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is DENIED. Flores may resume the lawsuit if he pays the full filing fee of $400 and provides proof that he has paid the $50 in sanctions imposed by the Southern District of Texas within thirty days of the issuance of the Final Judgment. All motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 11/24/14. (mll, )

Download PDF
Flores v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION DANNY FLORES, #1824094 § VS. § TEXAS DEPT. OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv775 ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-styled and numbered civil action was heretofore directly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore . ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Flores’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis (docket entry #3) is DENIED. Flores may resume the lawsuit if he pays the full filing fee of $400 and provides proof that he has paid the $50 in sanctions imposed by the Southern District of Texas within thirty days of the issuance of the Final Judgment. It is finally ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of November, 2014. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.