Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al, No. 6:2009cv00304 - Document 198 (E.D. Tex. 2011)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT that the parties take nothing and that all pending motions are DENIED as moot. All costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. All claims, counterclaims, and third-party claims are DISMISSED in their entirety. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 01/27/11. cc:attys 1-28-11(mll, ) (Entered: 01/28/2011)

Download PDF
Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al Doc. 198 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORACLE CORP., ET AL. Defendants. § § § § § § § § No. 6:09cv304 LED-JDL JURY DEMANDED FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the dismissal of all Defendants, the Court hereby enters Final Judgment. Plaintiff Aloft Media, LLC filed suit against eleven (11) Defendants in this case on July 14, 2009 (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff amended its complaint on December 18, 2009, adding more Defendants (Doc. No. 43). Since that time, all Defendants have been dismissed: Oracle Corporation (Doc. No. 21), Oracle USA, Inc. (Doc. No. 21), Yahoo!, Inc. (Doc. No. 13), Google, Inc. (Doc. No. 15), Fair Isaac Corp. (Doc. No. 192), Fidelity Investments, LLC (Doc. No. 159), Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC (Doc. No. 93), Scottrade, Inc. (Doc. No. 137), TD Ameritrade, Inc., (Doc. No. 93), Halliburton Co. (Doc. No. 197), E-Trade Securities, LLC (Doc. No. 93), Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (Doc. No. 93), and SAP AG (Doc. No. 76), and SAP America, Inc. (Doc. No. 76). It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the parties take nothing and that all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. All costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that all claims, counterclaims, and third-party claims in the instant suit be DISMISSED in their entirety. Dockets.Justia.com The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27th day of January, 2011. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.