Grigg v. Commissioner, SSA, No. 4:2022cv00052 - Document 20 (E.D. Tex. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion (Dkt. # 17 ) is GRANTED as amended by the Joint Stipulation. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/2/2022. (rpc, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Grigg v. Commissioner, SSA Doc. 20 Case 4:22-cv-00052-ALM-CAN Document 20 Filed 11/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 722 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION KATHY JOVETTA GRIGG v. COMMISSIONER, SSA § § Civil Action No. 4:22-CV-52 § (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) § § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff Kathy Jovetta Grigg’s Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Dkt. #17) and the Joint Stipulation for EAJA Fees (Dkt. #19), wherein Plaintiff and the Commissioner stipulate to an award of $7,000.00 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, finds that Plaintiff’s Motion is well taken and should be granted as modified by the Joint Stipulation. Accordingly, It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion (Dkt. #17) is GRANTED as amended by the Joint Stipulation. The Commissioner is directed to pay seven thousand dollars and zero cents ($7,000.00) in attorney’s fees under the EAJA. Payment shall be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel of record at his office: Christopher Lawrence Coats, Coats & Todd, PC, P.O. Box 836170, Richardson, TX 75083-6170. Defendant’s payment of this amount bars any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees and expenses in . connection with this action. Defendant’s payment of this amount is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to seek attorney fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 2nd day of November, 2022. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
