Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mapp, III et al, No. 4:2016cv00246 - Document 139 (E.D. Tex. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 121 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Evidence filed by William E Mapp, III. Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Summary Judgment Evidence is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/8/2017. (cm, )
Download PDF
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mapp, III et al Doc. 139 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION § § § § § § § v. WILLIAM E. MAPP, III Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-00246 Judge Mazzant MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court are Defendant William E. Mapp, III’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Summary Judgment Evidence (Dkt. #121). In separate Memorandum Opinion and Order issued contemporaneously with this Order, the Court found that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be denied as to all claims, except as to the issue of integration, because Plaintiff failed to meet its burden to show that there are no issues of material fact and that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In light of this holding, the Court finds that these this motion to strike Plaintiff’s summary judgment evidence is moot in light of the Court’s Order.1 CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the Court finds Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Summary Judgment Evidence (Dkt. #121) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court reviewed Defendant’s motion to strike. However, striking this evidence would not change the result of the Court’s order on the motion for summary judgment, as there are still existing issues of material fact that must be resolved by a jury. As such, the motion is moot. 1 Dockets.Justia.com SIGNED this 8th day of November, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE