Donovan v. Allstate Texas Lloyds, No. 4:2011cv00246 - Document 19 (E.D. Tex. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Report and Recommendations, Order, Plaintiffs Objection to Removal and Motionto Remand (Dkt. 7) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 7/18/11. (fnt, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION DONOVAN WADE, Plaintiff vs. ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYDS, Defendant. § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-CV-246 § § § MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 19, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff s Objection to Removal and Motion to Remand (Dkt. 7) should be DENIED. The court, having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff, is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. Plaintiff s Objection to Removal and Motion to Remand (Dkt. 7) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 18th day of July, 2011. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
