King v. Cardinal Services, LLC et al, No. 2:2019cv00217 - Document 158 (E.D. Tex. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION - Denying 130 Motion to Exclude Dr. Vohra; denying 140 Motion to Exclude Dr. Barisa. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 4/25/2021. (ch, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
King v. Cardinal Services, LLC et al Doc. 158 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TAIWAN KING, Plaintiff, v. CARDINAL SERVICES, LLC and RAEGAN LEMAIRE, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 2:19-cv-00217-RSP MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude Testimony of Rahul Vohra Regarding Future Medical Expenses (“Dr. Vohra Motion”) and the Motion to Limit the Testimony of Mark. T. Barisa, Ph.D. (“Dr. Barisa Motion”), both filed by Plaintiff Taiwan King. Dkt. No. 130, 140. Plaintiff’s Dr. Vohra Motion is DENIED on its merits. Plaintiff’s Dr. Barisa Motion is DENIED as untimely. The deadline for filing dispositive motions, including Daubert motions, was March 1, 2021. Dkt. No. 53 at 3. The parties filed a number of motions on March 1, 2021. Dr. Barisa’s deposition was taken on December 14, 2020. Dkt. No. 140-1 at 2. There is no reason, nor does the Plaintiff attempt to show good cause, for waiting until the business day before trial to submit this motion. Any objections to Dr. Barisa’s testimony will be taken up contemporaneously with his live testimony. SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2012. SIGNED this 25th day of April, 2021. ____________________________________ ROY S. PAYNE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
