Specialized Monitoring Solutions, LLC v. ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services, No. 2:2017cv00768 - Document 73 (E.D. Tex. 2019)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT Signed by Judge William C. Bryson on 02/07/2019. (klc, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Specialized Monitoring Solutions, LLC v. ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services Doc. 73 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SPECIALIZED MONITORING SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ADT LLC d/b/a ADT SECURITY SERVICES, § § § § § § § § § Case No. 2:17-CV-768-WCB-RSP Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT In an order filed today, the Court has granted summary judgment in favor of defendant ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services summary judgment and against plaintiff Specialized Monitoring Solutions LLC on the ground that the asserted claims of United States Patent No. 6,657,533 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Pursuant to Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P., the Court hereby ORDERS AND ENTERS JUDGMENT as follows: 1. Claims 1–5, 7–9, 17–23, 25–27, and 35–36 of United States Patent No. 6,657,533 are invalid. 2. Plaintiff Specialized Monitoring Solutions LLC takes nothing from defendant ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services. 3. Pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 1920, the Court finds that defendant ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services is the prevailing party in this matter and that costs are taxed in favor of the defendant ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 7th day of February, 2019. ____________________________ WILLIAM C. BRYSON UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
