Acer America Corp. et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,, No. 2:2009cv00324 - Document 30 (E.D. Tex. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER granting extension to respond to amended complaint. Signed by Judge Illston on 2/20/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009) [Transferred from California Northern on 10/16/2009.]

Download PDF

Acer America Corp. et al v. WI-Lan, Inc., Doc. 30 Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 Document 26 Filed 02/20/2009 Page 1 of 7 MCKOOL SMITH PC Gayle Rosenstein Klein State Bar No. 237975 399 Park Avenue, Suite 3200 New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 402-9400 Facsimile: (212) 402-9444 Email: gklein@mckoolsmith.com Attorneys for SPECIALLY APPEARING DEFENDANT Wi-LAN Inc. MCKOOL SMITH A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 ACER AMERICA CORP., APPLE INC., DELL INC., AND GATEWAY, INC. 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT WI-LAN INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 Subject to its special appearance, specially appearing defendant Wi-LAN Inc., by and 20 through its counsel, requests that defendant’s time to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint 21 be extended until a date ten (10) days after Judge James Ware rules on Wi-LAN Inc.’s Motion to 22 Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, and 23 Motion to Transfer to First Filed Forum, filed January 15, 2009, in a related declaratory 24 judgment action styled Intel Corp. v Wi-LAN Inc. et al, 5:08-cv-4555 (N.D. Cal.). 25 This stipulated request is made on the grounds that the parties wish to avoid duplicative 26 motion practice. Judge Ware’s anticipated ruling in the Intel case will give the parties substantial 27 guidance as to how to proceed and may eliminate the need for motion practice in the instant 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI) -1- Dallas 272777v1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW Document 26 Filed 02/20/2009 Page 2 of 7 1 action. Accordingly, it is in the interest of private and judicial economy to extend the time for 2 Wi-LAN Inc. to answer or otherwise plead until a date ten (10) days after this Court’s ruling in 3 Intel Corp. v. Wi-LAN Inc. et al. 4 Defendant’s time to respond to the complaint has been previously extended one time by 5 Order dated February 6, 2009 (DI 18). Plaintiffs Acer America Corp., Apple Inc., Dell Inc., and 6 Gateway Inc. stipulate to such extension and, therefore, do not oppose defendant’s request. 7 So stipulated, 8 9 Dated: February 20, 2009 MCKOOL SMITH A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N. Y. 10 MCKOOL SMITH PC By: 11 12 13 14 15 /s/ Gayle Rosenstein Klein State Bar No. 237975 MCKOOL SMITH PC 399 Park Avenue, Suite 3200 New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 402-9400 Facsimile: (212) 402-9444 Email: gklein@mckoolsmith.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI) Dallas 272777v1 -2- Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW 1 Document 26 Filed 02/20/2009 Dated: February 20, 2009 ORRICK HERRINGTON SUTCLIFF LLP 2 By: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MCKOOL SMITH /s/ Michael C. Spillner State Bar No. 205785 ORRICK HERRINGTON SUTCLIFF LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 614-7400 Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 Email: mspillner@orrick.comG. G. Hopkins Guy, III State Bar No. 124811 ORRICK HERRINGTON SUTCLIFF LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 614-7400 Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 Email: hopguy@orrick.com 10 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y. Page 3 of 7 11 12 13 14 Kai Tseng State Bar No. 193756 ORRICK HERRINGTON SUTCLIFF LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 614-7400 Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 Email: ktseng@orrick.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Attorney for Plaintiffs ACER AMERICA CORP. and GATEWAY, INC. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI) Dallas 272777v1 -3- Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW 1 Dated: February 20, 2009 2 Document 26 Filed 02/20/2009 Page 4 of 7 MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP By: 8 /s/ Mark C. Scarsi State Bar No. 183926 MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLP 601 South Figueroa Street 30th Floor Los Angeles , CA 90017-5735 Telephone: (213) 892-4000 Facsimile: (213) 629-5063 9 Attorney for Plaintiff APPLE INC. 3 4 5 6 7 MCKOOL SMITH A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N. Y. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI) Dallas 272777v1 -4- Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW 1 4 5 6 7 Page 5 of 7 JONES DAY By: 3 /s/ Arthur S. Beeman State Bar No. 237996 JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 Email: asbeeman@jonesday.com Pamela K. Fulmer State Bar No. 154736 JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 Email: pkfulmer@jonesday.com 8 9 10 MCKOOL SMITH Filed 02/20/2009 Dated: February 20, 2009 2 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y. Document 26 11 12 13 Thomas R. Jackson (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY 2727 North Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201-1515 Telephone: (214) 220-3939 Facsimile: (214) 969-5100 Email: trjackson@jonesday.com 14 15 16 17 18 Daniel T. Conrad (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY 2727 North Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201-1515 Telephone: (214) 220-3939 Facsimile: (214) 969-5100 Email: dtconrad@jonesday.com 19 20 21 22 23 Attorneys for Plaintiff DELL, INC. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI) Dallas 272777v1 -5- Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW Document 26 Filed 02/20/2009 Page 6 of 7 1 Upon the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, it is ORDERED that 2 specially appearing defendant Wi-LAN Inc.’s time to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint 3 herein is hereby extended until a date ten (10) days after this Court’s ruling on Wi-LAN Inc.’s 4 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Improper 5 Venue and Motion to Transfer to First Filed Forum, filed January 15, 2009, in a related 6 declaratory judgment action styled Intel Corp. v Wi-LAN Inc. et al, 5:08-cv-4555 (N.D. Cal.). 7 8 9 2/20/09 Dated: ________________, 2009 By: United States District Court Judge MCKOOL SMITH A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI) Dallas 272777v1 -6- Case 5:08-cv-05624-JW Document 26 Filed 02/20/2009 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that on February 20, 2009, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF 5 System. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system to 6 all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. Parties may access this filing through the 7 Court’s electronic filing system. 8 9 By: MCKOOL SMITH A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • ATTORNEYS NEW YORK, N.Y. 10 /s/ Michael G. McManus Michael G. McManus 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-CV-05624 (SI) Dallas 272777v1 -1-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.