Sensormatic Electronics Corportation v. W G Security Products, Inc et al, No. 2:2004cv00167 - Document 252 (E.D. Tex. 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - for the following reasons herein the court DENIES Motion 243 . Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 8/19/09. (ch, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WG SECURITY PRODUCTS, INC. AND EAS SENSORSENSE, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 2:04-CV-167-TJW MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Sensormatic Electronics Corporation s ( Sensormatic s ) post-trial Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and, in the alternative, Motion for New Trial (Docket No. 243) is before the court. For the following reasons, the court DENIES the motion. The court has carefully considered the parties submissions, the record, and the applicable law. During trial, both sides provided evidence and testimony supporting their positions. The jury found Defendants evidence more credible and the jury verdict was not against the great weight of the evidence. The court may not supplant its judgment for the jury s verdict where the evidence in the record can support the jury s verdict. Sensormatic has offered no persuasive arguments for the court to disregard the jury s verdict. The court finds that the evidence in the record supports the jury s findings with respect to the issues raised in the Motion. For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is DENIED. SIGNED this 19th day of August, 2009. __________________________________________ T. JOHN WARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
