Richard v. LaRule et al ***Case transferred to the Lufkin Division***, No. 1:2021cv00124 - Document 7 (E.D. Tex. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Regarding Venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 3/25/21. (tkd, )

Download PDF
Richard v. LaRule et al ***Case transferred to the Lufkin Division*** Doc. 7 Case 1:21-cv-00124-MJT-ZJH Document 7 Filed 03/25/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION LARRY WAYNE RICHARD § VS. § ASSISTANT WARDEN LARULE, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21cv124 MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE Plaintiff Larry Wayne Richard, an inmate formerly confined at the Lewis Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, proceeding pro se, brings this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Assistant Warden LaRule, Assistant Warden Sells, and Captain Davidson. The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrates. Analysis Plaintiff complains of the conditions of his confinement at the Lewis Unit and claims he is being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment by the defendants. The defendants are all employed at the Gib Lewis Unit which is located in Woodville, Texas. The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff’d per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973). When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. The claims which form the basis of plaintiff’s complaint occurred at the Lewis Unit which is located in Tyler County. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Tyler County is located in the Eastern District of Texas. As a result, venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:21-cv-00124-MJT-ZJH Document 7 Filed 03/25/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 50 While Tyler County is in the Eastern District of Texas, it is in the Lufkin Division of such district, rather than the Beaumont Division. When a case is filed in the wrong district or division, the court "shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). See Kreimerman v. Casa Veerkamp, S.A. de C.V., 22 F.3d 634 (5th Cir. 1994) (remanding the case to the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, with instructions that the case be transferred to the McAllen Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas pursuant to Section 1406(a)). For the reasons set forth above, this case should be transferred to the Lufkin Division of this court. A Transfer Order shall be entered in accordance with this Memorandum. SIGNED this 25th day of March, 2021. _________________________ Zack Hawthorn United States Magistrate Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.