Flowers v. Brown et al, No. 1:2017cv00460 - Document 39 (E.D. Tex. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER adopting 38 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/23/21. (tkd, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Flowers v. Brown et al Doc. 39 Case 1:17-cv-00460-MAC-KFG Document 39 Filed 03/23/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 118 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ALBERT FLOWERS, JR., Plaintiff, versus LATIGDRA BROWN, et al., Defendants EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-460 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Albert Flowers, Jr., a former inmate confined at FCI Beaumont Low, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this Bivens-type1 action against defendants Latigdra Brown, FNU Lucas, Margarita Laguna, and FNU Bowers. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the civil action as frivolous and for failure to state a claim (docket entry no. 38). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed to date. 1 In Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the Supreme Court recognized an individual’s right to recover damages from federal officials for violation of constitutional rights. Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:17-cv-00460-MAC-KFG Document 39 Filed 03/23/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 119 ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 23rd day of March, 2021. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
