Murphy v. Davis et al, No. 1:2017cv00431 - Document 31 (E.D. Tex. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER adopting 29 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/17/2020. (bjc, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Murphy v. Davis et al Doc. 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THOMAS LAMONT MURPHY, Plaintiff, versus FELICIAR DAVIS, et al., Defendants. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-431 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Thomas Lamont Murphy, an inmate formerly confined at the Hightower Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Feliciar Davis, David Montgomery, Mary Gilder, Wayne Brewer and Steve Massie. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing plaintiff’s civil rights action for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (docket entry no. 29). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed to date.1 1 A copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned with the notation “unable to forward” on June 19, 2020 (docket entry no. 30). Dockets.Justia.com ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 17th day of September, 2020. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
