Velez v. Martin, No. 1:2011cv00688 - Document 5 (E.D. Tex. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/7/12. (pkb, )

Download PDF
Velez v. Martin Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION WALTER VELEZ § VS. § M. MARTIN § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-688 MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner Walter Velez, a federal prisoner confined in Beaumont, Texas, brought this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the petition. The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and the pleadings. Petitioner filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the Court concludes the objections are without merit. Dockets.Justia.com ORDER Accordingly, petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7 day of March, 2012. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.