Lincare, Inc. v. McKinney et al, No. 1:2014cv01272 - Document 39 (W.D. Tenn. 2015)
Court Description: AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 1/30/15. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Docketed in next docket entry under SEAL, # 2 Exhibit B)(Breen, J.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lincare, Inc. v. McKinney et al Doc. 39 Att. 2 EXHIBIT B TO AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE JACKSON DIVISION LINCARE INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 1:14-CV-01272-JDB-egb SIDNEY McKINNEY, an individual, and HOME MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., a Tennessee corporation, Defendants. DECLARATION OF DEFENDANT SIDNEY McKINNEY IN COMPLIANCE WITH AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION STATE OF TENNESSEE COUNTY OF TIPTON ) ) ) I, Sidney McKinney, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declare: In accordance with my obligations pursuant to the Agreed Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction [Dkt.__], I have not violated any terms of this Court’s Permanent Injunction. If I have violated the terms of the Permanent Injunction, I have identified each such violation here: [state “none” or identify violations]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ___________________________________ Sidney McKinney Dated: ________________ 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE JACKSON DIVISION LINCARE INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 1:14-CV-01272-JDB-egb SIDNEY McKINNEY, an individual, and HOME MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., a Tennessee corporation, Defendants. DECLARATION OF MICHAEL PRICHARD IN COMPLIANCE WITH AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION STATE OF TENNESSEE COUNTY OF MADISON ) ) ) I, Michael Prichard, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declare: In accordance with Home Medical Products, Inc.’s obligations pursuant to the Agreed Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction [Dkt.__], I have conducted a reasonable investigation regarding Sidney McKinney’s activities for the month of _____________, and have concluded that based upon my reasonable investigation Sidney McKinney has not violated this Court’s Permanent Injunction. If Mr. McKinney has violated the terms of the Permanent Injunction, I have identified each such violation here: [state “none” or identify violations]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ___________________________________ Michael Prichard Dated: ________________ 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
