Baker v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 3:2014cv02187 - Document 20 (M.D. Tenn. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 18 is adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute, failure to obey Orders of the Court, and failure to keep the Court advised of his cu rrent address. Any pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/26/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Baker v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DERYL L. BAKER v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ) ) ) NO. 3-14-2187 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 18), to which no Objections have been timely filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute, failure to obey Orders of the Court, and failure to keep the Court advised of his current address. Any pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
