Page v. Kroger, No. 3:2013cv00237 - Document 33 (M.D. Tenn. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/24/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

Download PDF

Page v. Kroger Doc. 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION EUGENE PAGE v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I ) ) ) NO. 3-13-0237 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 30), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.