Timms v. Tucker et al, No. 3:2011cv01109 - Document 32 (M.D. Tenn. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 10 is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/12/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Timms v. Tucker et al Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION WILLIAM TIMMS v. DR. TUCKER, et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-11-1109 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 21), to which no Objections have been timely filed.1 The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Plaintiff sought additional time in which to file Objections, and the Court ordered that any Objections be filed by July 11, 2012. Docket No. 28. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
