Patterson v. Gentry et al, No. 3:2011cv00885 - Document 19 (M.D. Tenn. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 16 ), to which no Objections have been timely filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Hall and Gentry (Docket No. 8 ) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/26/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)

Download PDF
Patterson v. Gentry et al Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION RODNEY PATTERSON v. BETH GENTRY, et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-11-0885 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 16), to which no Objections have been timely filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Hall and Gentry (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.