Irvin v. Clarksville Gas & Water Department et al, No. 3:2011cv00529 - Document 78 (M.D. Tenn. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER: Report and Recommendation 74 is adopted and approved. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 51 is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to close the file, and any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/21/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)

Download PDF
Irvin v. Clarksville Gas & Water Department et al Doc. 78 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN v. CLARKSVILLE GAS & WATER, et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-11-0529 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 74) and Plaintiff’s Objections thereto (Docket No. 76). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 51) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to close the file, and any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.