Murphy v. Kollar-Kotelly et al, No. 1:2007cv00068 - Document 82 (M.D. Tenn. 2008)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum issued contemporaneously herewith, the Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation 75 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiff's & quot;Objections to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Juliet Griffin, and to Most of the Orders She Rendered on the 18th Day of September 2008" 80 are hereby OVERRULED; (3) Plaintiff's Motion for a Court Order to Require the Unit ed States Attorneys Office to Prosecute Defendants, Motion to Require the Clerk to Enter Default Judgments, Motion to Require the Clerk to Serve Pleadings in This Case on Additional Judges, and Motion to Require Clerk to Reassign This Case to Chief J udge Campbell 78 is hereby DENIED; (4) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 33 is hereby GRANTED; (5) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (6) Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of a final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 9/30/08. (af)

Download PDF
Murphy v. Kollar-Kotelly et al Doc. 82 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION CHARLES M. MURPHY, JR., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-0068 Judge Echols ORDER For the reasons explained in the Memorandum issued contemporaneously herewith, the Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 75) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiff’s “Objections to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Juliet Griffin, and to Most of the Orders She Rendered on the 18th Day of September 2008" (Docket Entry No. 80) are hereby OVERRULED; (3) Plaintiff’s Motion for a Court Order to Require the United States Attorney’s Office to Prosecute Defendants, Motion to Require the Clerk to Enter Default Judgments, Motion to Require the Clerk to Serve Pleadings in This Case on Additional Judges, and Motion to Require Clerk to Reassign This Case to Chief Judge Campbell (Docket Entry No. 78) is hereby DENIED; 1 Dockets.Justia.com (4) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 33) is hereby GRANTED; (5) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (6) Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of a final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). It is so ORDERED. _______________________________ ROBERT L. ECHOLS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.