Sarten v. Bradshaw et al, No. 3:2021cv00399 - Document 30 (E.D. Tenn. 2022)
Court Description: JUDGMENT, the CourtDISMISSED Plaintiffs Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion and Order that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Katherine A. Crytzer on 7/14/22. (c/m Avery Sarten 121 Pardue Lane Lenoir City, TN 37772) (ADA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sarten v. Bradshaw et al Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE AVERY SARTEN, Plaintiff, v. VALI KHAIROLLAHI, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 3:21-CV-399-KAC-DCP JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court DISMISSED Plaintiff’s Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion and Order that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. SO ORDERED. ENTER: s/ Katherine A. Crytzer KATHERINE A. CRYTZER United States District Judge ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT s/ LeAnna R. Wilson CLERK OF COURT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
