Williams v. Robinson et al, No. 3:2021cv00248 - Document 32 (E.D. Tenn. 2022)

Court Description: JUDGMENT. For the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court DISMISSED Plaintiffs Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Because the Court CERTIFIED that any appeal would not be t aken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Katherine A. Crytzer on 7/27/22. (c/m Daniel L Williams 398170 MORGAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX PO BOX 2000 WARTBURG, TN 37887) (ADA)

Download PDF

Williams v. Robinson et al Doc. 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE DANIEL L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON ROBINSON and JONATHAN CORBIN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:21-CV-248-KAC-DCP JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court DISMISSED Plaintiff’s Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Because the Court CERTIFIED that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. SO ORDERED. ENTER: s/ Katherine A. Crytzer KATHERINE A. CRYTZER United States District Judge ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT s/ LeAnna R. Wilson CLERK OF COURT Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.