Marlow v. United States Marshal Service, No. 3:2021cv00156 - Document 9 (E.D. Tenn. 2021)
Court Description: JUDGMENT ORDER, this prisoner's pro se civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. §1983, is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the mem orandum opinion and order that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Charles E. Atchley, Jr on 6/4/21. (c/m)(ADA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Marlow v. United States Marshal Service Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE NATHANIEL S. MARLOW, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:21-CV-156-CEA-DCP JUDGMENT ORDER For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion and order filed herewith, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this prisoner’s pro se civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion and order that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. SO ORDERED. /s/ Charles E. Atchley Jr. CHARLES E. ATCHLEY JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT /s/ LeAnna R. Wilson LEANNA R. WILSON CLERK OF COURT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
