Bohanon v. East Tennessee Human Resource Agency, Inc. et al (PLR2), No. 3:2014cv00469 - Document 52 (E.D. Tenn. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Court finds that the Motion for More Definite Statement 42 and Second Motion for More Definite Statement 46 are well-taken, and they are GRANTED. The Plaintiff SHALL FILE an amended Complaint that is consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order 41 on or before January 22, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 12/22/15. (ADA)

Download PDF
Bohanon v. East Tennessee Human Resource Agency, Inc. et al (PLR2) Doc. 52 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE RACHEL BOHANON, Plaintiff, v. EAST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:14-CV-469-PLR-HBG MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court, and the referral of the District Judge [Doc. 50]. Now before the Court are a Motion for More Definite Statement [Doc. 42] and Second Motion for More Definite Statement [Doc. 46], filed by Defendants East Tennessee Human Resource Agency, Inc., and Stacie Basler (collectively “Defendants”). In their motion, Defendants move the Court to enter an Order requiring the Plaintiff to file a more definite Complaint in light of the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered September 25, 2015, [Doc. 41], which dismissed certain causes of action in this case. Plaintiff has not responded to these motions, and her time for doing so has expired, see E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.1; Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, 6. The Court may treat this lack of response as acquiescence to the relief sought. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.2. The Court finds that the Motion for More Definite Statement and Second Motion for More Definite Statement may be granted on this basis alone. Dockets.Justia.com Further, the Court has reviewed the Motion for More Definite Statement and Second Motion for More Definite Statement, and the Court finds that the arguments presented therein appear to be appropriately supported and consistent with applicable law. Based upon the foregoing, the Court finds that the Motion for More Definite Statement [Doc. 42] and Second Motion for More Definite Statement [Doc. 46] are well-taken, and they are GRANTED. The Plaintiff SHALL FILE an amended Complaint that is consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order [Doc. 41] on or before January 22, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTER: United States Magistrate Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.