Campbell v. Knipper et al (PLR1), No. 2:2018cv00085 - Document 54 (E.D. Tenn. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION: for the good cause stated, defendant Russell Mattocks' motion for a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) [Doc. 47] is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on April 30, 2020. (copy mailed to Michael James Campbell c/o 9271 Hwy 11w Box 4, Mooresburg, TN 37811, and also to Mickey Zimmerman, Joanne Klepper, and Custody Rights Guardian of Mason Zimmerman c/o 107 Glenwood Ave, Bulls Gap, TN 37711) (AYB)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Campbell v. Knipper et al (PLR1) Doc. 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MICHAEL JAMES CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES KNIPPER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:18-CV-85 REEVES/WYRICK MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the court on defendant Russell Mattocks’ motion for a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) [Doc. 47]. By prior order, this Court dismissed all claims against Mattocks [Doc. 38]. The dismissal of Mattocks from this action has not been appealed, and the time for doing so has expired. Pursuant to Rule 54(b), “any order . . . that adjudicates fewer than all the claims of the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties does not end the action as to any of the claims or parties” unless the court directs entry of a final judgment for those parties or claims upon the express finding of “no just reason for delay.” Defendant Mattocks argues there is no just reason to delay entry of a final order as it relates to him. The Court notes that plaintiff has not opposed the motion and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, for the good cause stated, the motion for entry of a final judgment [Doc. 47] is GRANTED. Enter: ____________________________________________ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:18-cv-00085-PLR-CRW Document 54 Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 188 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
