Schaeffer v. Jackson-Schaeffer (PLR2), No. 1:2017cv00147 - Document 73 (E.D. Tenn. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, entered as a Judgment: After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with United States Magistrate Judge Lee's Report and Recommendation and hereby ADOPTS it. For the reasons stated in the R&R, Mr. Schaeffer's motion for attorneys' fees and expenses [D. 65] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and a judgment is entered against Ms. Jackson-Schaeffer in the amount of $78,534.79. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on May 3, 2018. (AYB)

Download PDF
Schaeffer v. Jackson-Schaeffer (PLR2) Doc. 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA DANIEL SCHAEFFER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. ELIZABETH SHIRLENE JACKSON-SCHAEFFER, Respondent. NO. 1:17-CV-147 REEVES/LEE MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Lee’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [D. 72] regarding Daniel Schaeffer’s motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses [D. 65]. Judge Lee recommends that Mr. Schaeffer’s motion be granted in part and denied in part, and that a judgment be entered against Elizabeth Shirlene Jackson-Schaeffer in the amount of $78,534.79. There have been no objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed to treat any objection as forfeited. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2). After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the R&R and hereby ADOPTS it. For the reasons stated in the R&R, Mr. Schaeffer’s motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses [D. 65] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and a judgment is entered against Ms. JacksonSchaeffer in the amount of $78,534.79. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ _ _ _ _ ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT A S S C UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT s/ John L. Medearis CLERK OF COURT 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.