Scheetz v. Weber et al, No. 4:2013cv04011 - Document 14 (D.S.D. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER re 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Scheetz may have until June 14, 2013, to file a substantive responsive brief. Signed by US Magistrate Judge John E. Simko on 5/31/13. (DJP)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Scheetz v. Weber et al Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION FILED MAY 3 1 2013 **************************************************** DARYL T. SCHEETZ, * * CIY. 13-4011 * * -vs* ORDER * DOUGLAS WEBER, Warden; and * THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE * STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA; * * Respondents. * * **************************************************** Petitioner, On May 29,2013, Petitioner filed his response to the February 5,2013 Opinion and Order. Rather than filing a substantive response, Petitioner correctly pointed out an error in the order. Accordingly, itis ORDERED that: 1. Paragraph 2 on page 3 ofthe February 5,2013 Opinion and Order is amended to read as follows: " ... the parties shall file briefs, documentation, and/or other appropriate authority showing cause why Scheetz's federal habeas petition, filed January 28, 2013, should not be dismissed as untimely pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2244(d)(1). 2. Scheetz may have until June 14, 2013, to file a substantive responsive brief. Dated this JI day of May, 2013. BY THE COURT: Jo imko tates Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
