Trantham v. Omni Financial of Nevada Inc., No. 6:2023cv01960 - Document 16 (D.S.C. 2023)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER that the court is adopting Magistrate Judge McDonald's 14 Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that the defendant's motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 6) is granted and this action is dismissed. The defendant's request for sanctions is denied. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 10/10/23.(pbri, )

Download PDF
Trantham v. Omni Financial of Nevada Inc. Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Tara Trantham, Plaintiff, vs. Omni Financial of Nevada, Inc., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 6:23-1960-HMH-KFM OPINION & ORDER This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kevin F. McDonald, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina. The magistrate judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the magistrate judge or recommit the matter with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2006). The parties filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. In the absence of objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). The court must “only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face 1 Dockets.Justia.com of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005). After a thorough review of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the court adopts Magistrate Judge McDonald’s Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 6) is granted and this action is dismissed. The defendant’s request for sanctions is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Henry M. Herlong, Jr. Senior United States District Judge Greenville, South Carolina October 10, 2023 . 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.