Allen v. Apple J LP, No. 3:2010cv01633 - Document 109 (D.S.C. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER and OPINION decided by a jury in favor of the defendant Apple J and Apple Gold as to plaintiff's race discrimination claim and dismissing the plaintiff's claim for successor employer liability with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Margaret B Seymour on 12/5/2012. (asni, )

Download PDF
Allen v. Apple J LP Doc. 109 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Charleston Allen, Plaintiff, v. Apple-J, L.P. and Apple Gold, Inc., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No. 3:10-1633-MBS ORDER AND OPINION Plaintiff Charleston Allen (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against his former employer, Apple-J, L.P. (“Apple J”), alleging race discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17. (ECF No. 1.) In an amended complaint filed on September 13, 2012, Plaintiff named Apple Gold, Inc. (“Apple Gold”) as a defendant in the matter and asserted a cause of action against Apple Gold as a successor corporation to Apple J. (ECF No. 62.) Thereafter, on November 12, 2012, the parties filed a joint stipulation that the court would “decide the issue of whether Apple Gold is a successor employer and, if so, the scope of its liability after trial if there is a verdict for Plaintiff” on his claim for race discrimination. (ECF No. 88.) On November 13, 2012 through November 15, 2012, the parties tried Plaintiff’s race discrimination claim before a jury. (ECF Nos. 92, 100, 101.) On November 15, 2012, the jury returned a verdict for Apple J and Apple Gold on Plaintiff’s claim for race discrimination. (ECF No. 104.) In accordance with the determination by the jury that Apple J and Apple Gold did not subject Plaintiff to race discrimination, the court dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff’s remaining claim against Apple Gold for successor employer liability. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Margaret B. Seymour__________________ MARGARET B. SEYMOUR CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE December 5, 2012 Columbia, South Carolina 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.